Home Search

- search results

If you're not happy with the results, please do another search

Out Loud: Harry and Mary Sigworth …

0

In late January 2000, the Associates of Idyllwild Arts Foundation held Idyllwild Alive History II, a multiple-weekend event of long-time Hill residents reminiscing. I recorded the event and transcribed it for a series in the newspaper.

The first panelist, and one of the most memorable to me, was Mary Sigworth whose family bought a vacation cabin here in 1925. She spoke of the one-way rutted road her family took in a 1925 Reo to travel to and from Idyllwild. She spoke of Idyllwild’s golf courses in the 1920s and 1930s. She spoke of hiking the wilderness and entertainment in town. She talked of Idyllwild’s role in World War II aiding soldiers.

But my favorite was this: “[Harry and I] met in the third grade in Long Beach. It happens that Harry was the new boy and the teacher put him in my row and told me to take care of him. He was such an embarrassed boy and it was really something to make him feel comfortable. And through the years — it’ll be 55 years in October … I’ve told Harry, ‘I think I wish I could find that teacher and ask her if I could be excused.’”

Yet anyone who knew Harry and Mary Sigworth knew them to be tied to each other thick and thin — soul mates for life.

They had moved here full-time in 1985 and contributed immensely to the community in many volunteer roles. They both exuded gentleness with intelligence, and beautiful smiles. The warmth of Mary’s smile always brightened a room. And their patience set an example.

When they moved to the desert, as is the case with  many others who reach that age, we knew it was time, but a sad occasion to hear of.

Both born in 1922 they died at age 92 within 10 days of each other. RIP to a loving and missed couple.

Becky Clark,
Editor

Readers write: Let’s share the road

0

Editor: 

As a relatively new resident of Idyllwild, I have greatly enjoyed cycling several mornings every week on highways 243 and 74. When first cycling in the area, I noticed how disciplined motorists were, with about 95 percent passing me at a safe distance.

Following the introduction of AB1371 (the 3-feet law) I have noticed this discipline’s slight improvement, to almost 100 percent. This suggests to me that AB1371 is not a major burden, given that the vast majority of local drivers were already fulfilling the spirit of the law before it even came into effect. Personally, I always wave to show my appreciation to motorists who make an extra effort to give me space as they pass.

A proposal to license bicycles is not well conceived. Given the current crisis of poor health affecting Americans (especially children), surely we should be encouraging healthy activities such as bicycle use, not making it more costly.

Would licensing be fair for the majority of cyclists who never ride their bikes on highways? How about the hundreds of mountain bikers who visit Idyllwild annually (making a significant contribution to the local economy) to use our nationally famous dirt tracks, almost none of whom ever take their bikes onto the paved roads?

If California cyclists were taxed to use highways through licensing, I suspect more of them would want to get their money’s worth, and you might find more cyclists on roads than at present. Surely that is the opposite of what proponents of a bicycle license really want.

Incidentally, I own two vehicles, so I pay my fair share of highway taxes already. Of course, I don’t get a discount on my vehicle registrations for the 300-plus days a year they sit idle in the driveway whilst I am out on my bike (although I would happily accept one).

Since I moved to Idyllwild, almost every issue of the Town Crier has reported one or more serious road accidents. None of those has involved a bicycle.

As a driver, I would be far more concerned about reckless users of motorized vehicles on our roads than I am about the occasional cyclist I may encounter. In order to warn drivers of the possibility that they may encounter bicycles, signs along our highways encourage us to “share the road.” That seems like reasonable advice, both literally and figuratively, for everyone to live by.

Jon King
Idyllwild

Readers Write: Holding IFPD board accountable

0

Editor:

Grand jury investigations are lawsuits. Grand jury reports are the adjudicated results. When a respondent loses a grand jury lawsuit they have specific accountable and actionable obligations under the Penal Code. Not implementing these mandates is not only an insult to the grand jury but a slam to the supervising judge. Idyllwild Fire Protection District lost its lawsuit against the 2013-14 grand jury who stated that Chief Reitz and Mark Lamont must be investigated for termination proceedings.

The 2014-15 grand jury under Judge Cope has determined that IFPD has failed to comply with its mandates under California Penal Code 933.05 and given a deadline of last week to comply. IFPD responded with a letter refusing to again comply asking the jury to advise them how they have violated PC 933.05.

The grand jury and Judge Cope are not legal counsel to IFPD.  When you lose a civil or criminal complaint where the Penal Code governs what happens next, perhaps you shouldn’t insult the gatekeeper, Judge Mark Cope, and his jury.

When asked what the penalties were for refusing to comply with PC 933.05 they said they didn’t know.  If you violate the Penal Code perhaps you should have your attorney tell you the consequences. This district has been aggressive, careless and abusive in all responses. Now to claim ignorance is a bit disingenuous.

Perhaps Judge Cope will direct his clerk or the grand jury to prepare subpoenas for IFPD commissioners’ and employees’ appearances before his court where he might explain that another refusal to comply with PC 933.05 will mandate a civil or even perhaps criminal contempt of court charge, an offense punishable by admonishment, fine or imprisonment.

Perhaps the 2014-15 grand jury will attempt to remove IFPD officers under Government Code 3060 for willful violation of Penal Code 933.05.

Some people think this is far-fetched. But this board has now been accused of violating PC 933.05 by the new grand jury, an action almost never used. Hmm. This board deserves the obvious writing on the wall if just for their ignorance. Unfortunately, it’s far more than that — misconduct under the Penal Code.

I have to wonder what other IFPD indiscretions/misconduct will creep to the top of the mud hole this year. Save Idyllwild taxpayers and voters from what will likely happen next. Resign, all of you.

Jeff Smith
Pine Cove

Calling high school seniors interested in service academies

0

Congressman Raul Ruiz has announced the deadline for submitting an application for a service academy nomination. Congressional nominations are accepted for U.S. Military Academy at West Point, New York; U.S. Naval Academy at Annapolis, Maryland; U.S. Air Force Academy at Colorado Springs, Colorado; and U.S. Merchant Marine Academy at Kings Point, New York.

The honor of attending a service academy comes with an obligation and commitment to serve in the military for a minimum of five years upon graduation.

Oct. 15 is the deadline to apply for a nomination to four of the five service academies across the nation. High school students graduating in 2015 and interested in attending one of the academies should contact Ruiz’s Director of Constituent Services Gina Chapa for more information.

She can be reached at email at [email protected] or 760- 989-4111.

More information, including the application, is accessible on his website: www.ruiz.house.gov/service-academies1/.

Ruiz and Nestande debate issues: The congressional candidates faced off on TV

0

Sunday evening, Oct. 5, the candidates for U.S. Congressional District 36 (which encompasses the Hill) debated before a television audience in Palm Desert.

Incumbent Democratic Rep. Dr. Raul Ruiz and state Republican Assemblyman Brian Nestande answered a series of questions from a panel of three desert reporters.

While the debate began with friendly overtures and a handshake between the two candidates, tensions built as the one-hour debate wound down.

The debate began with opening statements from each candidate. Going first, Nestande posed the traditional Reagan question probing voter feelings.

“Do you believe our country is moving in the right direction?” he asked rhetorically. Then answered, “I don’t. Bigger government is a smaller paycheck.”

Throughout the evening, Nestande continued to emphasize the economy and government spending.

Ruiz’s message was his profession as an emergency room physician rather than a career politician. “Washington is broken because of career politicians interested in political bickering and games rather than getting things done.”

The first question asked about their positions on immigration. Ruiz answered first, “It’s a privilege not a right for immigrants to live in this country.” He added, “Every sovereign nation has the right to protect its borders.”

Comprehensive immigration reform is Ruiz’s priority and he stressed that he opposes amnesty.

In his rebuttal, Nestande argued that comprehensive reform was a long-term process that could take years. In contrast, he supports immediate legislation to secure the borders.

Later in the evening, he stated, “There’s a big difference between Congressman Ruiz and myself on securing the borders. It’s not just kids and mother coming across the borders.”

He advocated using technology such as sensors as part of the solution rather than the government relying solely on more troops or police. “It’s not an engineering problem, but a political problem,” he added.

The panelists also inquired about tax positions. The first of these questions asked the candidates’ views on maintaining many of the tax deductions.

Ruiz’s answer was that of the traditional politician in calling government spending out of control and favoring fiscal responsibility and balanced budgets. Without identifying a specific solution, he charged Nestande with wanting to “… balance the budget on the backs of the seniors and the middle class.”

In his response, Nestande characterized Ruiz’s comments as “good talking points, but they match his record.” Eventually, he stated directly that he would not support eliminating the current mortgage deduction.

Another question addressed the candidates’ views on the Affordable Care Act. Answering first, Nestande spoke to his bill in the state Assembly, which would have required legislators to chose a medical plan for the California exchange. “We should have legislators live under the laws they pass,” he said.

Nestande also referred to the ACA problems during its inception last fall such as the cancelation of many individual policies.

While he opposes the law, he did not put its repeal on his priority list, he said.

The current high-profile educational issue — Common Core standards — was the subject of a question, too.

“I wouldn’t be standing here if it wasn’t for high-quality education,” Ruiz said. “Education is very important. It’s the center of American democracy. Education is a very important pillar of the American dream we all are trying to achieve.”

In his comments, Nestande responded, “The problem with Common Core is that California had to lower its standards.” He stressed his long-standing support for career and technical education programs in the school systems.

One of the final questions addressed their positions on legalizing marijuana use. Replying first, Ruiz stated, “I don’t support legalizing marijuana throughout the nation … In the emergency room, I got teenagers coming for accidents and pain, then asking for marijuana.”

“I’m against legalization of pot,” Nestande simply said.

In response to a question about the drought, Ruiz blamed global change as man-caused and urged recycling water better.

Nestande referred to his support of assembly Democrats’ bills for ground-water measures. He also urged construction more storage facilities — dams. “That’s what’s missing in the [drought] equation,” he said.

Other topics raised during the hour included renewal energy, gun ownership (both support), the debt ceiling, Ebola, earthquake preparation and gay marriage (both candidates said they support marriage equality).

The full debate may be seen at http://kesq.com/news/watch-the-complete-ruiz-nestande-debate/28963668.

Indian gaming Proposition 48 breaks new ground

0

Proposition 48, a new Indian gaming authorization, is on the ballot as a “veto” referendum — that is, it was put on the ballot by persons hoping to garner enough “no” votes to overturn a proposal for a new tribal casino in the Central Valley, which the California Legislature, Gov. Jerry Brown and the federal government already approved.

The proposal, which literally breaks new ground, authorizes one California tribe, the North Fork Rancheria of Mono Indians, to build a casino on purchased land 38 miles from their reservation in Madera County. The new casino would be built nearer urban clusters, just off Highway 99 and north of Fresno and Madera in an area where five other tribal casinos are already in operation.

If approved by “yes” voters, this would be the first such authorization for a tribal casino to be built off the owning tribe’s reservation. The North Fork and the professional gaming interests that would work with them to construct the casino sought the off-reservation location because it would be closer to major freeways and Central Valley urban centers, including the major valley city of Fresno.

The proposal also allows the Wiyot Tribe in Humboldt County, hundreds of miles from the purchased North Fork land in Madera County, to participate in revenue generated by the North Fork Rancheria casino. The legislation prevents the Wiyot from constructing a casino on their own reservation at any point in the future because of negative environmental impact concerns.

Because of potential economic impact of the new casino on the nearest of the five existing reservation casinos, the legislation also includes payments to the Picayune Rancheria of the Chukchansi Indians of approximately $25 million through June 30, 2020 and a restriction that the North Fork delay the opening of any hotel at their casino until after July 1, 2018. These requirements would only take effect if the Chukchansi do not challenge, through lobbying or in the courts, North Fork’s casino building plans. The North Fork negotiated and signed memoranda of understanding with three local governmental entities that would receive financial benefit as outlined by the memoranda: the county of Madera would receive one-time payments ranging between $6.9 million and $17.9 million and annual payments over the life of the compact of $3.8 million, adjusted for inflation, once the casino opens. The memorandum with the county also states a goal of employing 50 percent of casino employees from residents of the county; the city of Madera would receive one-time payments ranging between $6.3 million and $10.3 million and annual payments of $1.1 million once the casino opens. The memorandum also includes a goal of hiring 33 percent of casino employees from city residents; the agreements also require annual payments of $47,500 to the Madera Irrigation District with the provision for additional payment if more water is used than “expected.” Finally, the agreements require the North Fork to make annual payments to other local governments within 25 miles of the casino if those governments are negatively impacted.

Gaming contracts between the state of California and Native American tribes specify how the state may regulate tribal casinos and require tribes to make payments to the state for specific purposes. Most frequently, those purposes are to fund revenue sharing with the 73 state tribes that currently do not operate casinos or operate casinos with fewer than 350 slot machines (the North Fork will have 2,000 slot machines; and to increase an Special distribution Fund used to fund programs to assist people with gambling problems, pay the state’s costs to regulate tribal casinos and make grants to local governments affected by tribal casinos.

In an analysis of Prop 48, the office of the attorney general estimates operation of the North Fork casino could negatively affect other nearby gaming operations and reduce discretionary spending of nearby residents on other things, such as movies or dining out, impacting local businesses and reduced tax revenues to state and local governments.

Measure proponents, seeking “yes” votes, including Governor Brown, Tom Wheeler, the chairman of the Madera County Board of Supervisors and Robbie Hunter, the president of the State Building and Construction Trades Council of California, cite potential creation of thousands of new jobs in an economically depressed area of the state and fund local sheriff, police, fire and other first responders.

Opponents, seeking “no” votes, including Madera County Supervisor David Rogers and Senator Dianne Feinstein, argue that authorizing “off reservation” casinos contradicts the spirit of the initial authorization of Indian gaming and will open a floodgate of new casino construction in an already saturated market. Also Central Valley farmers, already strapped with diminishing water resources, are concerned that building of the casino would negatively affect agricultural production by allowing North Fork to draw as much as 100 million gallons of groundwater annually.

The LA Times supports the measure as a revenue creator, noting that the North Fork had initially tried to develop a casino on their tribal land but couldn’t get interest from the gaming industry because the land was remote and hard to reach. Editors note that the legislature and governor must approve these “off reservation” casinos on a case by case basis.

The Orange County Register opposes the measure as a violation of previous voter-approved legislation that restricted casinos to tribal lands.

SPORTS PHOTOS: Idyllwild School, high school and beyond

0
The Idyllwild Middle School cross country team competed in its first meet Oct. 6, at Vail Lake Middle School in Temecula. The team has been practicing since the beginning of the school year and everyone had a terrific first race of the season. Runners and coaches (from left) are Coach Misty Hitchcock, Hannah Johnson, Tobey Posey, Bryan Mayberry, Max Neu, Arriana Felix, Jeremiah Whitney, Christian Ramirez, Vinny Parrillo, Grace McKimson, Tim Mejia, Rene Hernandez, Jadon Meskimen, Matilda Terry, Kevin Posey, Emmi Norris, McKenzie Nunez, Breanna Sheppard, Max Neu and Coach Lee Arnson. The team banner was graciously donated by the Lumber Mill restaurant. Photo by Joe Neu
The Idyllwild Middle School cross country team competed in its first meet Oct. 6, at Vail Lake Middle School in Temecula. The team has been practicing since the beginning of the school year and everyone had a terrific first race of the season. Runners and coaches (from left) are Coach Misty Hitchcock, Hannah Johnson, Tobey Posey, Bryan Mayberry, Max Neu, Arriana Felix, Jeremiah Whitney, Christian Ramirez, Vinny Parrillo, Grace McKimson, Tim Mejia, Rene Hernandez, Jadon Meskimen, Matilda Terry, Kevin Posey, Emmi Norris, McKenzie Nunez, Breanna Sheppard, Max Neu and Coach Lee Arnson. The team banner was graciously donated by the Lumber Mill restaurant.
Photo by Joe Neu
Brenna and Cole Campbell, the late Jimmy Campbell’s children, attend Hamilton High School. Cole is on the varsity football team. Jimmy was a Town Hall recreation director.  Photo by Michael Vladika
Brenna and Cole Campbell, the late Jimmy Campbell’s children, attend Hamilton High School. Cole is on the varsity football team. Jimmy was a Town Hall recreation director. Photo by Michael Vladika
Emma Klingaman (right) of Idyllwild receives the overall third place in the Southeastern Collegiate Cycling Conference this year. In last weekend’s conference finals at the school she attends, Lees-McRae College in Banner Elk, North Carolina, she was sixth in the cross-country race, fifth in short-track race and won her first dual slalom race.   Photo by Michael Morton
Emma Klingaman (right) of Idyllwild receives the overall third place in the Southeastern Collegiate Cycling Conference this year. In last weekend’s conference finals at the school she attends, Lees-McRae College in Banner Elk, North Carolina, she was sixth in the cross-country race, fifth in short-track race and won her first dual slalom race.
Photo by Michael Morton

Clubs: Permaculture

0

The next Permaculture meeting (a subgroup of Idyllwild Conversations) will be held from 6:30 to 8 p.m. Tuesday, Oct. 21, at the Idyllwild Library. The topic is “Harvesting and Preserving Food in Idyllwild.” The meeting is free, and all are invited.

Monday, Oct. 20 last day to register to vote in General Election

0

Secretary of State Debra Bowen is reminding Californians to register to vote by Oct. 20 so they can weigh in on important issues on the Nov. 4 General Election ballot.

Postmarks do count for mailed registration applications. Voter registration closes 15 days prior to any California election.

A person must re-register to vote after moving, changing names or changing political party preference.

Eligible Californians can register online at RegisterToVote.ca.gov or get a paper application at local libraries, post offices, California Department of Motor Vehicles offices, and other government offices. Voter registration applications are available in English, Spanish, Chinese, Hindi, Japanese, Khmer, Korean, Tagalog, Thai and Vietnamese.

“Registering to vote is one of the easiest and most important things you can do in a democracy,” said Secretary Bowen, California’s chief elections official. “Don’t give up your voice by not voting. Register by Oct. 20 so that you can weigh in on proposed changes to our laws and decide who leads our government.”

Voter registration records are maintained at county elections offices. The Secretary of State offers Californians a convenient web portal for checking their own voter registration status at www.sos.ca.gov/elections/registration-status.

For more information about registering to vote, visit www.sos.ca.gov/elections/elections_vr.htm.

Garcia discusses State Senate issues with TC

1
Bonnie Garcia Photo Courtesy of Bonnie Garcia for senate
Bonnie Garcia
Photo Courtesy of Bonnie Garcia for senate

Editor’s note: On Sept. 30, former state Assemblywoman Bonnie Garcia and current candidate for the state Senate’s 28th District spoke to the Town Crier on a variety of issues from the campaign.

Education and the recent state court decision on tenure

In June, Judge Rolf Treu of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County ruled that several state laws relating to administering education policy were unconstitutional. The most prominent was the ruling against teacher tenure after two years, but Treu also found that statutes regarding the dismissal process for ineffective teachers and the layoff policy of last-hired, first-fired were unconstitutional.

In September, Attorney General Kamala Harris appealed Treu’s decision, with the full support of Gov. Jerry Brown and Superintendent of Schools Thomas Torkalson.

When asked her opinion of the ruling and appeal, Garcia replied, “It’s important for students of California, but I’m disappointed that the state is challenging this decision.”

If teachers fail in the classroom, they are failing the students, Garcia stressed. “I’m disappointed the state spent resources challenging the decision rather than put the resource to improve classes and buildings.”

“It’s a fight for the [teachers’] union and not in the best interest of the kids,” she lamented saying many community school districts have forgone technical and vocational courses to force students into college-oriented tracks.

Realignment between state prisons and county jail space

In 2011, the state began implementing Assembly Bill 109, which transferred or kept many convicted felons in county jails in order to reduce the state prison population, pursuant to a federal court order.

“AB 109 is an abysmal failure and detriment to communities across the state,” she said. She characterized the result as “turnstile justice” because many convicted are released within days instead of being incarcerated.

Because state and county facilities are designed for different purposes, long-term vs. shorter incarceration, “Counties, including Riverside, are spending millions to provide services not covered by the state,” she asserted.

Garcia said as an Assembly member, she advocated constructing more facilities for prisoners. But she stressed, this was not simply prison space. Many need health facilities, including mental health, and facilities for an aging inmate population. Removing these segments of the prison population would free many beds for the “worse-of-the-worse.”

The failure to move on this principal is the motive behind the federal lawsuit and the reason the governor has had to push many criminals out to the communities, she opined.

Campaign financing

When asked if more disclosure of campaign finance sources was needed, Garcia said, “I think there is sufficient disclosure.”

The Attorney General’s website (http://cal-access.sos.ca.gov/campaign/) reports campaign contributions quarterly until the final weeks before the election, when daily reports from candidates are required. “There you see every penny to me and how I spend it,” Garcia said.

There’s more! See next week’s paper for part II of this interview.

s2Member®