|

This is the first in a series of editorial articles explaining the major provisions of the Ralph M. Brown Act, California’s local-government open-meeting laws. This week’s article addresses some of the more basic questions and answers.

The “Ralph M. Brown Act” is the official statutory name for California Government Code sections 54950 through 54963. These laws were passed by the California Legislature to provide for “open government” in California. The governing bodies of agencies are required to conduct their discussion and deliberations and take their actions openly. The Brown Act specifically provides that our public servants have no right to decide what it is good for the people to know and what is not good for them to know. The Brown Act acknowledges that Californians insist on remaining informed so they can retain control over their public institutions. (Section 54950.)

Q. How does the Brown Act provide for open government?

A. With few specific exceptions, the Brown Act requires that local agencies hold their meetings locally so the people they serve can attend. Boards of local agencies are required to give notice of meetings and to post agendas in advance of their meetings so that people will know what will and will not be discussed. They must allow time for the public to comment at meetings. Local agency boards are not permitted to hold secret meetings. They may not meet informally either in person or electronically, either as a group or in a series of one-on-one meetings.

The Brown Act has been interpreted by California courts to mean that all of the deliberative processes by local legislative bodies must be open to public scrutiny. Numerous provisions of the Brown Act combine to assure public notice of and access to meetings of local legislative bodies. (Sections 54953, 54953.3, 54953.5, 54954.2 & 54957.5.)

Q. Does the Brown Act apply to local governmental agencies?

A. Yes. In fact, the Brown Act applies only to local agencies. (Sections 54951 and 54952.) (State agencies have a separate open-government act.) The Brown Act was enacted because of abuses by a local agency (a school district) so as to prevent such abuses in the future.

Q. What local agencies serving our Hill are required to comply with the Brown Act?

A. There are these 10, at least: The governing boards of County Service Area 36 (currently with no board), County Service Area 38, Fern Valley Water District, Hemet Unified School District, Idyllwild Fire Protection District, Idyllwild Water District, Lake Hemet Municipal Water District, Mt. San Jacinto Community College District, Pine Cove Water District and the Riverside County Board of Supervisors.

Future articles will examine specific Brown Act provisions in more detail.

 

Similar Posts

  • Open government 101

    By Peter Scheer, Executive Director First Amendment Coalition   Prop 42, on the ballot for California’s June 4 election, will amend the Constitution to assure that local governments are legally bound to observe open-government requirements. If you prefer transparency to secrecy in your city government, local school board or county government, then the choice is…

  • |

    Past Tense: August 13, 2020

    70 years ago – 1950 Trail improvements, the stringing of a phone line from Tahquitz Peak to Round Valley, campsite maintenance and the building of a well were just some of the projects underway at the Mt. San Jacinto State Park. 65 years ago – 1955 High up on the wooded slopes of Strawberry Valley,…

  • |

    Past Tense: December 16, 2021

    65 years ago – 1956Former California Attorney General Robert Kenny was in town paying a visit to his former business associate, Hazel Cress. 60 years ago – 1961Emax saw the painting of yellow lines on the highways as “a trend toward the police state.” 55 years ago – 1966A series of storms soaked the mountain,…