By David L. Greene, M.D., F.A.C.O.G.
Contributed

As a medical doctor, I swore an oath of allegiance to my patients. I swore to treat and prevent disease where possible. I would never knowingly or negligently do a disservice. The tenet to uphold the highest standards of ethics when advising or providing care are supposed to be embraced by every doctor, nurse and pharmacist who swear an oath to that end.
Testimony before Congress suggests that this is a man-made pandemic. As Sen. Dr. Rand Paul points out during his interview of Dr. Anthony Fauci, there is a paper trail of published scientific articles supporting that this pandemic is the result of what is called “gain of function” research. Most people do not even know what “gain of function” means. It means that research scientists, including medical doctors, work on genetically modifying viruses to make them highly infectious and easily transmittable in humans, as is the case with SARS-Co-V-2. Laboratory animals are then exposed to these modified viruses to study the effects and lethality.
In the case of SARS-Co-V-2, they used a coronavirus found commonly in bats. This type of research has many implications, not the least of which is creating biologic weapons to be deployed against humans. Adding insult to injury, Paul presents government documents that show American taxpayer money had been used to fund these projects.
COVID-19 (the disease) and the “vaccines” (sold to the world as a treatment plan to end the pandemic) are considered by reputable scientists to be biological weapons.
Why is there such a massive push, spending billions of taxpayer money to get the “vaccine” into as many people as possible?
A growing number of medical professionals, research scientists and investigative reporters have been de-platformed (kicked off) Facebook, YouTube, Instagram and Twitter, shunned by mainstream media and eliminated from Google search engines for simply asking questions regarding the safety and efficacy of these “experimental shots,” that are NOT approved by the FDA.
Why is it that drug treatments that have been proven safe and effective for non-COVID conditions have not been granted what is referred to in the medical profession as “off label” use?
It is no coincidence that treatment options such as monoclonal antibodies, hydroxychloroquine products, Ivermectin, antibiotics, Vitamin D and Zinc in various combinations are not approved as a first-line treatment, even though there are several scientific papers demonstrating efficacy when introduced early to treat the symptoms of COVID-19. (Don’t forget, President Donald Trump received “non-approved” treatments and recovered with lightning speed.)
We are told by those in charge there is not enough “data” to show they are safe and effective for COVID-19? Why not then approve an EUA (emergency use authorization) for them? After all, we are facing a pandemic, are we not?
The data from such use has already established its efficacy when used early, that is before symptoms become severe. Multiple articles have been published demonstrating the effectiveness of these protocols. Most of this information has been censored. There are websites that are posting this information, but one has to know where to look.
As far as I can tell, there are at least two important reasons why medical therapy is being denied to those experiencing COVID-19 symptoms:
1. The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) of 1986 was signed into law by President Ronald Reagan. This law prevents those injured (including death) as a result of a reaction from a vaccine from suing the vaccine manufacturer. In simple terms, our government protects vaccine manufactures from all liability.
2. An EUA for “medical” treatment other than a “vaccine” would negate the need to rush poorly tested vaccines to market.
“Under section 564 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C ACT) when the Secretary of Health and Human Services declares that an emergency use authorization is appropriate, [the] FDA may authorize unapproved medical products or unapproved uses of approved medical products to be used in an emergency to diagnose, treat, or prevent serious or life-threatening diseases or conditions caused by chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN) threat agents when certain criteria are met, including there are no adequate, approved, and available alternatives [https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/mcm-legal-regulatory-and-policy-framework/emergency-use-authorization].”
With regard to the reporting of adverse events from the COVID-19 vaccine program, current numbers from VAERS (vaccine adverse event reporting system), as of May 22, 2021, report over 227,800 adverse events, 4,200 deaths, and 18,500 serious injuries. Add to this the fact that the VAERS system grossly underreports the true number of injuries. Regardless of how underreported this is, these numbers are sufficient enough to warrant a halt to this program. Instead, the experiment goes on. https://rickjaffeesq.com/2021/02/19/what-the-heck-is-the-harvard-pilgrim-study-and-did-it-really-say-that-about-the-underreporting-of-vaccine-adverse-events.
In 1976, a decade before Reagan signed the 1986 vaccine ACT (to shield vaccine manufacturers from lawsuits), there was an outbreak of Swine Flu. Forty-five million people received the vaccine. The program was halted after 25 deaths and more than 500 people developed the neurologic complication known as Guillain-Barré syndrome. That calculates out to a 0.000056% death rate. Compare that number to the current death rate of today’s vaccine program where 130,615,797 people (as of May 24) in this country have been fully vaccinated with 4,200 VAERS reported deaths for a death rate of .003%. That’s far more deaths than in 1976.
Why then, with so many deaths related to the COVID-19 vaccine program, does our government push to continue? The short answer is there is too much money to be made in the vaccine industry, which is totally protected from any liability in our country.
Those who have chosen to become part of the experiment and survive have had their biology forever changed. In the coming months and years ahead, it has been predicted that millions will needlessly die or suffer horrible impacts, having had their genome manipulated. The humanized mice experiments reveal shocking evidence of the lethality of the modified spike protein found in the mRNA vaccines according to Dr. Richard Fleming, PhD, MD, JD, preventative and nuclear cardiologist (www.flemingmethod.com).
My question to the millions who have taken the “vaccine” either by election, naivety, manipulation or fear is: Do you really think the rest of us are refusing the “vaccine” because we want to hurt you? We chose not to surrender ourselves to the “vaccine” because questions remain unanswered and those that are answered regarding safety, efficacy or necessity are confusing and ambiguous.
Those of us who refuse to comply with this unjust agenda to “vaccinate” every man, woman and child will continue to do so until those responsible for this crime against humanity are brought to justice.
You can shun us. You can call us names. You can threaten us. You can censor us, but you cannot make us go away. There are simply too many of us willing to say NO!
We in America, will stand united in our fight for our constitutional rights upon which America was founded. We will unite in the months and years ahead not only in America but globally with our brothers and sisters who are willing to say NO to the “vaccine.”
This program is currently being incentivized with money or special privileges in direct violation of the Nuremberg Code, which states in part: “The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision [https://media.tghn.org/medialibrary/2011/04/BMJ_No_7070_Volume_313_The_Nuremberg_Code.pdf].”
There is simply too much data confirming a growing death toll and morbidity from all over the world for those pushing this agenda to say, “We just didn’t know. We were just following orders.” It didn’t hold up in Nuremberg then, and it won’t hold up in Nuremberg today.