readers-write

Editor:

In reference to the letter from William R. Faurot in the Oct. 13, Town Crier: “How soon we forget.”

He states, “… people have the right to defend themselves and a nation the right to defend itself. George Washington’s Continental Army was supplemented by the various state militias composed of private citizens bearing their own arms. ”

After the Revolution, the supremacy of the federal government and Army was established during the putting down of the Whiskey Rebellion.

Mr. Faurot goes on to state that the Rudy Ridge shootings and the child abuser David Koresh and the Waco Branch Davidian Incident were “government provocations” that were responsible for the bombing of the Oklahoma City Federal Building.

Then Mr. Faurot states, “The current administration has made a series of end runs in an effort to silence gun owners” … and finally, “Yes, the federal government might attempt to take away all guns. They have not done so because the political and economic costs of confiscation would be enormous.”

Nobody in the administration/federal government has suggested any such action.

The 2nd Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees the right of U.S. citizens, “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”

No administration or president can throw out the Constitution or change laws without action by Congress.

As a gun owner for over 30 years, I have no such concerns. I could care less what guns Mr. Faurot has, and I suspect the federal government has other things to do than to plot to take Mr. Faurot’s guns from him.

Bob Saunders

Garner Valley/North Hollywood

Similar Posts

  • Opinion: HELP Center

    If there’s anything that gripes my soul, it’s to hear someone complain about those less fortunate than themselves, “just not trying hard enough,” or “taking advantage of the system.” Then there are those who say giving to the poor just enables them to stay poor, or to take advantage of those who would help them….

  • Opinion: Rebuttal

    Are the negative, character-assasinating comments about Eduardo Santiago being posted or printed in our paper? I surely hope not. It would set a terrible precedent for anyone to name-call (“Leave your L.A. ego in L.A.”) or give misinformation (“Hardly anyone in attendance bought books”). I attended all series events and two times the bookstore ran…

  • TC can’t let go

    Editor: “Many refused to vote for candidates,” read the damning headline. Refused? How about, “Didn’t vote for three candidates, only voted for two, or only voted for one?” Well, 37.10 percent of the Idyllwild Fire Protection District registered voters at least voted, which is pretty much in line with the turnout in both 2001 and…

  • Opinion: Proposition 30

    While reading the Town Crier online this morning [Nov. 1], I noticed that your listing for Proposition 30 says something on the order of “Gov. Brown’s Bill To Fund Education.” After recently registering and reading the propositions, I find your description misleading. The bill doesn’t guarantee one thin dime for education. Instead, it is a…

  • |

    Readers Write: Retiring Community Lumber

    Editor: Richard started Community Lumber in 1979 with an idea of how to bring reasonably priced building materials to Idyllwild and make a living here. Richard and Karin met in 1980 and joined together in life and in business. We met Eduardo in 1984, and together over more than three decades nurtured that seed of…